It turns out that the plural of Apocalypse is Apocalypses. At least, so the Internet tells me. I think it should be Apocalypae, but I can’t have everything I want all the time. This is one of the things told to me as a child that turned out to be true. Another one is that my parents are not made out of money. If they were, I would be. But I am not. It is not true that if I keep making that face then my face will stay that way. This statement qualifies as a threat for my own good, kind of like hell or hairy palms.
Anyway, one could question whether there is a need for a plural to Apocalypse. After all, if the Apocalypse is the end, why would there be more than one? Of course, this logic is utter foolishness and not worthy of any further conversation. There is an entire genre of post-apocalyptic creative endeavor. Ergo, it is entirely possible that we could undergo a zombie apocalypse, destroy all the zombies, and then be subjected to a nuclear apocalypse. Hopefully, that little misconception is now debunked.
Speaking of zombie apocalypses, I do have one point of contention. Can’t you just erect a fence? Zombies could never climb over. If you grow a little garden and raise some animals you can have a happy, self-sustainable community. Eventually, the zombies will realize the futility of lurking around your fence and go elsewhere in their search for brains. Problem solved.
According to the Internet, there is some debate as to whether Frankenstein qualifies as a zombie. After all, he is a reanimated creature. Also, Frankenstein has the wooden, lurching gait of the zombie. He does not, however, have an unquenchable desire to eat human flesh- at least not that I am aware of. It’s a conundrum. Kind of like the whole tomato fruit/vegetable thing.
Regardless, the human interest in the Apocalypse never wanes. Personally, I would prefer an apocalyse that yields some Road Warrior-esque afterworld. This, of course, assuming that I survive the apocalyptic event. Otherwise, I could care less. I just think that fighting for survival in a Darwinian wasteland is a lot more exciting than hiding from zombies or fighting off sentient machines. I guess it is the Goldilocks in me. Fighting the zombies would be too easy- they are slow and mindless and could be systematically destroyed (in my opinion). The sentient machines would easily find us with their heat seeking technology and either render us slaves to do their bidding or simply exterminate our species like so many vermin. Thus, this scenario is too difficult. But roaming the wastelands with my gang of ruthless motorcycle nomads seems just right.
I’d change my name to something more menacing. Maybe I’d wear a priest’s get-up and call myself the Sinister Minister. Or I’d just take a one word name like Pain or Agony or Syphilis. Certainly, I would get a mohawk. And a sawed-off shotgun. Bow down to Syphilis, King of the Afterworld! Hahahaha. I can hardly wait. I refuse to wear those leather chaps with the holes in the rearend, however. Even a post-apocalyptic marauder needs to draw a line somewhere.